After the conviction, the Dupuy family pronounced: “Lucio was killed for being a man”

ramon dupuy referred to the sentence to life imprisonment what did you recieve Magdalena Esposito Valenti and abigail paezconvicted of aggravated manslaughter Pike, the five-year-old boy beaten to death in La Pampa two years ago. “Lucio was killed for being a boy,” said the grandfather.

we came to look life imprisonment and we are satisfied with that. I am not satisfied with the fact that the aggravating circumstance of gender hatred has not been added to it. There is evidence that Lucito was killed for being a man. We will continue,” said Ramón Dupuy.

In addition, the man asserted that his son ChristianLucio’s father left the courts located in the Judicial City of Santa Rosa, in La Pampa, early. because “he was very bad” after hearing the sentence against those responsible for his son’s crime handed down this Friday, February 17 at noon.

The Dupuy lawyer gave details of the steps to follow

For his part, the family lawyer dupuyMario Aguerrido said that there was a series of state instances that could have prevented the homicide.

“We have a certain basis, which is to determine how Lucio was murdered. Now we have to go the links of responsibility in this matter”, said Aguerrido, building in relation to the judge Ana Clara Perez Ballester that he gave custody to the mother and that he has a jury against him initiated by the provincial justice.

The Justice sentenced the murderers of Lucio Dupuy to life imprisonment

Likewise, he pointed against the Health areas that were not alerted by the numerous times that the boy was hospitalized for beatings, against which they also raised investigation requests. “I am not ruling out Education either. We will make a proposal and the Justice will determine if there is criminal responsibility or not,” he added.

With respect to the sentence, the lawyer assured that “the seriousness of the act and everything that the five-year-old boy suffered” deserved the application of the maximum sanction provided for by the penal code. “Lucio’s autopsy is quite graphic. The fact has no explanation. The only rational way to explain it is from hatred of the male gender,” he pointed out.

Lucio Dupuy: the prosecutor in the case said that the convicted “have no chance of being released”

The sentence for the crime of Lucio Dupuy

Two years after the case that shocked the country, judges Aníbal Olié, Alejandra Ongaro and Daniel Sáez Zamora sentenced life imprisonment those responsible for the murder of Lucio Dupuy. However, they ruled out the aggravating factor of “gender hatred” that the Dupuy lawyer and plaintiff had raised in the trial.

Lucio’s parent, Magdalena Esposito Valenti (24 years old), was considered “the material author and criminally responsible for the crime of triple qualified homicide for the bond, treachery and cruelty”. For her part, she was acquitted “for the act of aggravated sexual abuse for which she was timely accused.”

On the other hand, abigail paez27 years old, was considered “the material author and criminally responsible for the crime of double qualified homicide for treachery and trial in real contest with the crime of sexual abuse with carnal access through the anal route executed with a phallic object aggravated for being guarded and for having occurred against a minor under 18 years of age taking advantage of the situation of coexistence as a continuous crime”.

CDI/MCP