While attention is focused on the political scenario and the definitions that are expected in Kirchnerism regarding the candidacies, the Supreme Court of Justice has on its to-do list two key definitions of great impact in the K core and in Cristina Kirchner. The three respond to electoral questions: it is about the suspension of the elections in San Juan and Formosa, and an objection to the presidency of the Buenos Aires PJ in the hands of Maximum Kirchner.
The four supreme judges have in their hands those three decisions after the vice president in May Plaza raise the tone of his questioning against the Highest Court.
On Thursday, during the act in Plaza de Mayo for the 20th anniversary of the inauguration of Néstor Kirchner, Cristina implied that the current conformation is worse than that of the automatic majority by Carlos Menem and He described her as an “undeserving jerk”. “Argentines deserve to once again have a Supreme Court of Justice that is called as such without turning red,” he added.
Javier Milei stoned Together for Change: “They are the dirtiest in politics”
That is why the three definitions that are pending will be read as a courtly response to the advance of Kirchnerism.
In the case of San Juan, it is worth remembering that on May 9 the Court suspended the elections for governor and lieutenant governor by making room for a precautionary measure that questioned a new re-election of Sergio Unac.
The file called “LIBERAL AND OTHER EVOLUTION C/ SAN JUAN, PROVINCE OF S/AMPARO” had its last movement on May 17 when the Court requested a new opinion from the Attorney General, who already had ruled on April 13 that the Court should not intervene in the re-election of Uñac. The presentation of Liberal Evolution against a new candidacy of the current governor was rejected by the Provincial Electoral Tribunal and then landed in the Court, which was granted.
Meanwhile, on May 15, the province provided the reports that the Court had requested and, simultaneously, requested the recusal of Horacio Rosatti, Carlos Rosenkrantz and Juan Carlos Maquedawho refused to leave.
The Court is pending a substantive decision on whether or not the re-election of Uñac is allowed according to the interpretation it makes of the Provincial Constitution.
Until that is out of place, it is not possible to set a date for the elections in that province governed by the ruling party, with a Uñac who had decided not to sign the impeachment of the Court, something that was interpreted as a wink so that in the fourth floor of the Palacio de Tribunales do not object to his candidacy. At first he received a setback. It will be necessary to see if it is confirmed with the substantive ruling that is pending.
The Formosa case
In the case of Tucumán, where a precautionary measure was also accepted that suspended the elections by objecting to the candidacy of John Manzur, the Court allowed the suspension to be lifted after the decline of that candidacy. A substantive decision is also pending, although without the former chief of staff in the axis of direct impact of it.
But attention is also focused on the province of Formosa, from the challenge to the candidacy of Gildo Insfran for a new re-election. The proposal, signed by the former surrogate federal judge who became a national deputy of Together for Change Fernando Carvajal, already has the rejection of the Attorney General. In this case, the parties are attentive to the times.
Elections in Córdoba: the results of the voting in 29 municipalities and communes
If the particularities of the case are ignored, it must be remembered that In the San Juan case, the Court took almost a month to rule on the precautionary request after the opinion of the Attorney General. If the same parameter is taken into account, the definition of Formosa would arrive at the end of June, but the elections are scheduled for the 25th of that month. There is a question that hovers over: will they do the same as in San Juan and Tucumán, by suspending the elections just a handful of days after they were held?
The answer remains to be known, but without a doubt that what will happen will have an impact on the entire ruling party. It’s that Insfran He has just been re-elected to the Justicialista Party Congress and in recent days he was syndicated as the man who began to weave the unity of the Frente de Todos in the face of the elections.
Maximum K and an effective? fire friend
The question will finish answering when the Court issues a ruling. If he decides to make room for the questioning against the presidency of Máximo Kirchner of the Buenos Aires Justicialista Party, the splinters could strongly shake the internal one from the author of the presentation: the Peronist ferdinand graymayor of Esteban Echeverria.
The Frente de Todos is agitated by the floor of the inmate and the lists
This communal chief, enemy of the deputy who knew how to be the head of the official block, presented in March 2021 a request to declare the “absolute and insane” nullity of the meeting of the Provincial Council of the PJ “and everything decided in it”. In other words, the appointment of Máximo Kirchner as president is left without effect.
On December 22, 2021, the Attorney General, with the signature of eduardo casal, declared the appeal inadmissible by arguing that the Court should not intervene because there is no federal issue at stake. From then on, during 2022, the file went through different offices of the vocal 3, with a last movement on February 14, according to what emerges from the digital file.
Rumors that the verdict is soon to come out also reached Esteban Echeverría, where They insist that it is an “irregular election.” “There was no vote, although there was a single list, the affiliate had the right to vote positively, blank or not to go, and that right was not exercised,” a source close to Gray told PERFIL, the Peronist who expects a favorable decision from the Court that for Cristina Kirchner outlaws Peronism.
ASV/ff
You may also like
