Andrea del Boca’s ex-partner was dismissed from the accusation of sexual abuse against his daughter

Last year Judge María Gabriela Lanz had ruled “lack of merit”. The same was appealed and, in an extensive ruling of two hundred pages, the investigating judge Alejandro Ferro dismissed Ricardo Biasotti in second instance.

The magistrate thought that “the evidence collected leads to classifying the complainant’s story as part of a memory of something that never happened.” In 2019, Anna Chiara, the daughter of Andrea del Boca, had denounced her father for aggravated sexual abuse.

In his ruling, Ferro added that “the presence of signs or psychological evidence that accounted for the sexual abuse maneuvers foisted on Biasotti has not been accredited, nor has it been detected.”

In addition to the dismissal, Biasotti, defended by the lawyer Marcelo Parrilli, obtained the “express record that the formation of this case does not affect the good name and honor that the person named would have enjoyed.”

“The evidence collected leads to classifying the complainant’s story as part of a memory of something that never happened,” the ruling states. A speech similar to that exposed by her colleague, Judge Lanz, who maintained that Anna Chiara had “implanted memories” and that there was a “lack of credibility in the complainant’s speech due to the results of the projective tests and the personality investigation “.

Before appealing the judge’s sentence, Anna Chiara, daughter of Andrea del Boca, published on her networks: “I answer with facts but the raw sincerity of my life is spoiled; a withering thanks to masked speeches and dark hands”.

“This court has in special consideration that, throughout the interruptions by professionals in all the judicial files in which the life of Anna Chiara Biasotti del Boca has been submerged (in which judges, minors’ advisers, social workers, therapists, as well as the educational authorities of the schools where the minor attended), none resulted in a situation of abuse like the ones denounced,” the magistrate said in his ruling.

In return, the judge established that “the expertise carried out by Biasotti realized that no signs of major psychopathological disorders or alterations were detected, with preserved judicial capacity, adequate management of the reality principle.”