Categories: Social Responsibility

Court ends special master review of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago records

A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that a judge’s order appointing a special master to review documents seized at former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort should be thrown out.

The ruling by a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit lifts previous restrictions on the Justice Department’s examination of classified documents and other records and will allow investigators to proceed with the investigation more quickly.

The panel said U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s September order to appoint an arbitrator and prevent the government from using a trove of documents she recovered from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort on Aug. 8 with a search warrant it was incorrect.

“The law is clear. We cannot write a rule that would allow any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant,” the panel wrote. “Accordingly, we agree with the government that the district court improperly exercised equal jurisdiction and that the dismissal of the entire proceeding is required.”

In a separate order, the panel said its order will take effect in seven days, barring any intervention by the Supreme Court. Trump could appeal Thursday’s ruling and request that the appeals court order be stayed.

NBC News has reached out to a Trump spokesperson for comment.

The appeals court ruling reverses Cannon’s appointment of Raymond J. Dearie, a US District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, to review all materials recovered from Mar-a-Lago after Trump’s team argued that they could not trust a so-called leak team at the Justice Department to set aside any privileged documents. The filter team is separate from the investigators conducting the criminal investigation.

Legal experts at the time criticized Cannon decision to grant Trump’s request for an independent review, with many questioning the implementation process and warning that the government’s eventual appeal would likely drag out the investigation further.

Two of the three judges on the appeals court panel, Britt Grant and Andrew Brasher, were Trump appointees. The third, Chief Justice Brill Pryor, was appointed by former President George W. Bush.

Anna Edwards

Recent Posts

Which companies are the top contributors to education and community development?

There is no reliable worldwide ranking of the ten largest corporate contributors to education and…

3 days ago

How 10 top brands use repair and reuse to enhance circular business models

Which 10 brands have embraced circular business models?A circular business model aims to keep products…

3 days ago

The 10 most advanced humanoid robots with demonstrated capabilities

The most advanced humanoid robots can navigate environments designed for humans, manipulate unfamiliar items, obey…

4 days ago

how emerging technologies will change workplaces and homes by 2030

10 emerging technologies most likely to transform our lives by 2030The technologies most likely to…

5 days ago

why 10 technological inventions failed despite anticipating future needs

10 Technological Inventions That Failed Despite Being Ahead of Their TimeBeing first is not the…

5 days ago

The impact of housing costs on purchasing power in 10 major cities worldwide

A high salary does not necessarily buy a comfortable life. What matters is how much…

5 days ago