Justice guarantees that the closure will be maintained in the third southern tray of La Bombonera

Hours after the confrontation Platense corresponding to the fourth date of the professional leagueThe authorities ratified the closure of the third southern tray of La Bombonera despite the claims of Juan Román Riquelme, who pointed out the prosecutor Celsa Ramírez. In this way, the Alberto Jose Armando Stadium It will continue with the reduced capacity for the next tournament match.

Last Thursday, the first instance court reported that until the institution complied with the requested requirements, the closure measure would continue. Unfortunately, this news does not go down well with the Xeneize leadership, which did not have favorable results in the last inspection of the sports scene.

Now a new requirement has appeared in this uncertain landscapeThe Soccer Stadium Execution Unit was requested to corroborate the information on safety regulations and criteria in the massive structures of the stadiumsto. . In this sense, it must be taken into account that the repairs carried out by Xeneize must comply with the standards to later confirm if this sector of the stadium guarantees the safety of its attendees.

This is the closing decree

Autonomous City of Buenos Aires,

As received, keep in mind both what was requested by the Private Defender, and what was ruled by the Prosecutor.

In this sense, pondering the observations made by the official experts in their report, whose conclusions ratify and sustain the suspicion threshold in relation to the structural and building conditions of the South Superior Tribune of the Boca Juniors Athletic Club; It is appropriate, taking into account the magnitude and technical complexity of the matter, as well as the legal assets in dispute, to expand and require accurate and specific information, in order to have conclusive elements that allow clearing up any hint of risk.

Precisely, in the first place, and without prejudice to the submission of reports from different government agencies, the Soccer Stadium Execution Unit is required, within the framework of its attributions, functions and obligations (conf. Art. 6 and 8 Law 5847) dictate urgently: a) inform and point out the regulations, administrative acts, norms that support the criteria of security and criticality massive structures in stadium materials and accompany them; b) if the repairs reported by the institution meet said standards imposed by the specific regulations that regulate the matter, responding to criteria of criticality and massive structures; and c) if the Upper South Tribune of the stadium, under such parameters, guarantees safety, being able to rule out any type of risk for the spectators.

Secondly, and taking into account a broad criterion of the right of defense, notify the lawyer of the institution, about the observations made by the party experts, in order to ratify, rectify, or make the presentation that he deems appropriate by law; in relation to: a) that the exhibited “technical” report shows a signature without clarification, and without the correct identification of the professional and his qualifying registration; b) the reasons for which the official experts were not duly involved in the tests tested in the stadium, as expressly required; c) to report the estimated weight that the grandstand supports in static load, taking into account its capacity of five thousand spectators; d) what is the coefficient of variation of that same static to dynamic load; e) if there is certainty that the coefficient of elasticity of movement of the structure supports the weight in dynamic load as it is lowered, in the game of last January 29, and if it ensures, with a degree of probability bordering on the certainty beyond all doubt, the absence of any risk of collapse, detachment or collapse of the upper south tribune.

GM