Marra against metro delegates: “We need people who work, not lazy and gangsters”

The Buenos Aires legislator ramiro marraspoke with Corina Paset on the mobile of Fontevecchia modeby net tv and RadioProfile (FM 101.9), about his project to end the stoppages in the subway “I don’t have dialogue with the metrodelegates because I don’t talk to gangsters and extortionists,” Marra said.

Corina Paset (CP): What is this project about?

It’s something very basic the subway is an essential servicethat many people use to go to work, and we are tired of these metrodelegatesthat they are a bunch of gangsters, put all the time different excuses for not work.

And then they have the hypocrisy or sincerity to say that I want more sleepIn other words, there are times when we have to stop with this type of extortion.

Ramiro Marra: “We are not going to fire public employees, we are going to cut the gnocchi”

PC: They state that they are actually asking for a reduction in the work week due to their exposure to asbestos. Is this topic in your project? Is spoken?

They’re making excuses all the time. I remember that a few years ago they said they had a wrist problem from carrying the SUBE, and that this made their wrists work more. He always has a different excuse.

What they want is to work fewer hours, that is what they are constantly asking for. In the Argentina we are in, which has a complicated situation and where we all have to make an effort to get ahead, metrodelegados: we need people who work, not lazy and gangsters.

PC: In this project you propose to dismiss the measures of force, wouldn’t this affect the right to strike that workers could have to demand the working conditions they are asking for?

When the right of another person is done systematically, extortionately and terminated, there is no right to strike. As the piqueteros do, it is trying to harm a third party in order to generate or validate your claims based on the fact that they have no interest, far beyond not working.

Beto Pianelli: “We have verified that our colleagues died from asbestos”

That is, it is not a right to strike at work, It is a right to strike for bums.

PC: Did you have the chance to talk with any of these metro delegates or with the union? For example, Gabriel Solano, another Buenos Aires legislator from the Left Front, quoted your tweet where he presented the project and wrote: “I would send Ramiro Marra to work with asbestos at the risk of contracting cancer.” What do you think about this?

Typical of the left. People who do not work or work and I don’t want to. I don’t have a dialogue with the metro delegates because I don’t talk to gangsters and extortionists.

PC: Is this project viable? Did you present it to the Legislature? Can you move forward? Can it be treated?

without a doubt, the projects presented by the liberals in a first measure are not accompanied by Together for Change, who has the majority in the Legislature. Suddenly, very similar measures appear after. It happened to us throughout the past year, which was our first year in the Legislature.

So, the project will not be discussed, but I am sure that our idea will continue to be inefficiently copied from us. Because what is happening with the government of Horacio Rodriguez Larreta is that he continually wants to copy us and it goes wrong.

Asbestos: what is the element for which the metro delegates claim

Come following the topic with technicians, engineers and specialists in these private topics with the metro delegates. I don’t know if you are aware and remember that when the Twin Towers crisis in the United States was in 2001, there was a huge amount of asbestos contamination because it was found in all the buildings, and all the firefighters or rescue workers had lung diseases. shortly after.

What we are discussing here is whether the proportions in which they are found in the resulting polluting places or not. It seems to me that since it is a discussion of a scientific and technical nature, not a political one, what should be promoted is, both from the company and from the delegates and the City Government, a technical audit in an institution that we all trust, in a third party to do a scientific analysis. Because what we are discussing is that and the discussion ends there.

In general terms, the rule of law is that, we delegate the decision to someone and then we comply with it. So, I wanted to leave you my recommendation, regardless of what you propose there. Probably what is interesting to close this topic in a definitive way is to request an audit from a scientific institution that we all trust. It could be a great Argentine or foreign university, if someone had some kind of prejudice regarding Argentina.

What is needed is a final opinion of contamination or not, how much does it do because obviously there is a discussion in the world regarding asbestos. Here the fundamental question is in the proportion that is found, how much of it is greater than what is found in all the other parts.

Dellecarbonara: “Asbestos in the subway is carcinogenic, the company does what it wants”

I agree with everything you are suggesting, but these people are not doing it in scientific terms, they are He does it in political terms, in an extortive way.

Metrodelegates don’t care about asbestos, they just fuck people up. It is not the first time that they abuse the rights that they supposedly have, because they always go over the rights of other people.

We have to divide the discussions, on the one hand the asbestos, and on the other, what they do, and not associate it because what they propose is a lie. They don’t have any scientific capacity to determine that, because the only one they have in recent decades has been to screw up the lives of Argentines.

BL J L