Yasky, about CFK: “Today it is not banned, but in three months it could be”

Hugo YaskySecretary General of the CTA, compared the situation of Cristina Kirchner with the proscription of Juan Domingo Peron, and referred to the judicial situation of the former president. “We all know that it is a rigged trial, almost a judicial farce,” declared the union leader in Fontevecchia modeby net tv and RadioProfile (FM 101.9).

What did the political table of the Frente de Todos leave you?

The first and fundamental thing, that step that for so long seemed difficult, bring together different sectors of the FdTto an important part of the Cabinet, to Máximo Kirchner and to the different referents of the union movement.

Many times it was questioned what step we could take, and the most important thing that he left behind was the possibility of holding the meeting and putting the views of different sectors on the table, and having done it with intellectual honesty, because with some exceptions, everyone went with an attitude of transparency. The continuity of this table is assured.

Do you think Cristina Kirchner will be a candidate?

I do not know but it would be very important if it were. For this reason, three months after saying that he is not still at the top of all the opinion polls.

With Máximo Kirchner as a surprise visit: all those present at the electoral table of the Frente de Todos

Do you like the word ban?

surely part of the worst political tradition. peron He was banned for 18 years, he won the blank vote but those who came second governed. It would be very bad, in the 21st century, to return somehow more evidently to the same place.

Is Cristina’s situation comparable to that of Perón at that time?

No, that’s why I say more. But the mechanism is the same, today the candidates can stay to live in the country.

But Cristina is not legally prevented from competing.

Temporarily, we all know that it’s a rigged trial, almost a legal farce. In a few years this will be referred to as the “infamous decade of Justice”, but as long as this situation is in force, they are in a position to proscribe it.

Agustín Rossi crossed Aníbal Fernández: “Cristina Kirchner is clearly outlawed”

It could potentially be outlawed, but as of today it isn’t.

Today it is not banned, but in three months it could be. In Brazil, when Lula began his electoral campaign against Bolsonaro, he was not proscribed, he had a pending trial, and after three months they ended up in jail.

Lula had 30 points and Bolsonaro four, but he won Bolsonaro. Since we know what the reality is and where they are going, it is valid to speak of a ban.

It is a fight between the de facto power that manages the Justice and the Argentine people, who want to be able to have a democracy where the leaders are not imposed by the four or five who want to be the owners of the country.

Is it valid to talk about a ban because of what could potentially happen taking into account what happened in other countries?

Absolutely.

The “proscription” was present at Cristina Kirchner’s birthday greeting

Many things can happen, right?

Many things can happen, which it will not happen is that they declare her innocentIt will not happen that they do not want to sentence her so that she is disqualified from holding public office, we all know that.

Alexander Gomel (AG): Given this judicial situation, was another type of attitude expected from Alberto Fernández?

Today we are carrying out a impeachment that we should have started much earlier. Of course, better late than never, but it is clear that the same reasons why we are carrying out this process today existed years ago.

It is true that there was an emergent event that caused embarrassment to all Argentines, which was the episode of the trip to hidden lakewhere Magneto finances a merry excursion

In all ways, except for that emerging one, the impeachment trial should have started earlier and perhaps it would have been a way to prevent judicial persecution in Argentina from continuing to be the order of the day as it is now.

Aníbal Fernández said that Cristina Kirchner “is not banned” and pointed against those who “want to ban” the President

What would be Alberto’s best attitude for space?

It will depend on Cristina’s last word. Alberto the other day had a clear phrase, “the candidate has to be the one who measures best in the polls”, that’s why depends on Christina if I review your situation of not being a candidate. By far she is the best candidate we have.

If Cristina is not, is the STEP instance opened?

The truth seems to me quite strange a STEP where a president competes with a minister. The same criteria that Alberto proposed must be imposed and the one that measures best should go. If Alberto is not a candidate, it is reasonable that there be a PASO.

The resources of Vaca Muerta, of lithium, the opportunities of Argentina, who will enjoy them? where are they going to stay? Are they going to serve for social development and wealth distribution or will they serve for more confrontation and inequality?

He factual power He wants there to be a government by the rich for the rich, because he knows that everything that comes next can generate a country with more wealth but also more poverty.

The table of the Frente de Todos, an essay of truce towards the definition of the presidential candidacy

If Cristina is not a candidate, does Alberto have a chance of a second term?

Nose. We need to have a candidate that excites the people and restore hope, and we have that possibility with Cristina, with no other.

Would the ruling party be satisfied with reaching April with 5% inflation? Was it a mistake to say the idea of ​​arriving with 3%?

Mass take office at a very difficult time, the country was falling into a slide and they wanted to remove the government before the end of the mandate. Finally, it was possible to put the car, which had gone to the grass, back onto the highway and from there one generates expectations, but then there are very powerful sectors that take care that it is not fulfilled.

Rosendo Fraga: “There is a crisis in both majority political spaces”

Is the responsibility of the employers?

There is a quota of 90% of very powerful sectors that seek a income with unusual voracityThere is no part of the world where there are companies that decide not to manufacture more so that prices continue to rise, and in Argentina there are.

Is there no responsibility of the Government in not generating measures to increase production and reduce the difficulties of that sector?

There is a responsibility of the Government that goes through the distribution, there they did lack policies, because it conditioned us so that the distribution could not take place. Since the salary collapse with macri even the external debt should have been dealt with differently.

MVB JL